F. Goodrich bicycles, sold in tire stores, Schwinn eliminated the practice of producing private label bicycles in 1950, insisting that the Schwinn brand and guarantee appear on all products. In exchange for ensuring the presence of the Schwinn name, distributors retained the right schwinn beach cruiser to distribute Schwinn bikes to any hardware store, toy store, or bicycle shop that ordered them. W. Schwinn tasked a new team to plan future business strategy, consisting of marketing supervisor Ray Burch, general manager Bill Stoeffhaas, and design supervisor Al Fritz.
By 1957, the Paramount series, once a premier racing bicycle, had atrophied from a lack of attention and modernization. Aside from some new frame lug designs, the designs, methods and tooling were the same as had been used in the 1930s. After a crash-course in new frame-building techniques and derailleur technology, Schwinn introduced an updated Paramount with Reynolds 531 double-butted tubing, Nervex lugsets and bottom bracket shells, as well as Campagnolo derailleur dropouts. The Paramount continued as a limited production model, built in small numbers in a small apportioned area of the old Chicago assembly factory. The new frame and component technology incorporated in the Paramount largely failed to reach Schwinn’s mass-market bicycle lines. In 1963 following the death of F.
Despite the substantive consolidation of Debtors’ estates, the new value advanced by True Fitness should be calculated on a debtor-by-debtor basis for reasons discussed in the Conclusions of Law. The difference stems from the fact that there is more excess new value, which cannot be used to offset later preferential transfers, when the Debtors are treated as separate entities. See Brown v. Shell Canada, Ltd. (In re Tennessee Chemical Co.), 159 B.R.
In sum, the foregoing evidence demonstrated that the transfers were not made in the ordinary course of dealing between Debtors and the Defendant. Rather, the Defendant made telephone calls to the Debtors requesting payment of their outstanding indebtedness and communicating to Debtors that new product would not be shipped unless at least some of the past due amounts were paid. These telephone calls from the schwinn ebike Defendant to the Debtors were a departure from the prior course of dealing of the parties. Thus, the evidence showed that the payments were unusual in that they were different from the Debtors’ prior payment practices, and they resulted from unusual collection efforts by the Defendant. Thorholm testified that he had discussions with Murray and Lamar after each of Lamar’s telephone calls from Stallings.
If the badge is missing, you may still have a Schwinn. The manufacturer distributed unbranded or rebranded bikes through other companies, especially prior to the 1950s. Schwinn said he didn’t shutter his company because demand for high-quality craftsmanship has dried up. He said the schwinn dealers main reason was that three of his seven employees were at or nearing retirement age, including himself at 69. In the 1980s, Waterford Precision started building cyclocross bikes. They are similar to the gravel bikes popular today, which also handle well on a range of surfaces.
1014, 1020 (Bankr.N.D.Ill. 1994) (Schmetterer, J.). “The doctrine is intended to protect the courts from being manipulated by litigants who seek to prevail twice on opposite theories.” Id. Although the doctrine is usually applied to successive suits, it is not so limited. Continental Illinois Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 998 F.2d 513, 518 (7th Cir. 1993), cert. Denied, 510 U.S. 1041, 114 S.Ct.
In Gorenstein, the Seventh Circuit found that “prejudgment interest should be presumptively available to victims of federal law violations. Without it, compensation of the plaintiff is incomplete and the defendant has an incentive to delay.” 874 F.2d at 436. The Circuit noted that there is no federal statutory interest rate on prejudgment interest, but recommended using the prime rate for prejudgment interest in such a situation. The prime rate is a “readily ascertainable figure which provides a reasonable although rough estimate of the interest rate necessary to compensate plaintiffs not only for the loss of the use of their money but also for the risk of default.” Id.